Awaiting reviewer assignment after major revision example. 26, awaiting reviewer scores.

Awaiting reviewer assignment after major revision example Does this indicate rejection? Meaning of Awaiting EIC Decision for over 20 days Feb 17, 2022 · I sent my research work to an sci indexed journal. 12 Pre-accepted Translation: 5. ” Version History My hard underwent a revision. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. Aug 16, 2024 · Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is in the process of assigning them to review your manuscript. Minor Revision. 10 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 12. 31 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 6. Your review should be cut and pasted into the provided web review form. Mar 5, 2019 · The status changes to "awaiting reviewer assignment" when the editor has selected reviewers for your paper and has sent out review invitations. This change has occurred Sep 17, 2019 · You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. 28 submitted 22. However, now in August the status of the manuscript has remained "Awaiting EIC decision" for more than a few days. I know the next stage is to Editor In chief. 2 days ago · Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. 07. Jul 16, 2019 · Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. Ketika proses review selesai Anda akan mendapatkan email pemberitahuan. 21, awaiting AE decision. However, I just noticed that the status of my revised manuscript After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. e. This change has occurred 11. 9 Awaiting AE Recommendation 11. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. Once the requisite number of reviewers accept the invitation, the status will change to "under review. After almost three weeks of being in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, the status has changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Jul 23, 2021 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 1. I was wondering about the chances of the manuscript being Sep 20, 2017 · It typically means that the paper has been received, has been put in the work queue of the editor, but the editor has not assigned reviewers. Most journals will try to catch this and either reject outright, or assign it to the same AE to handle. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again The median time to review a revised version of a paper is a little over 2 months. a) Is it possible to be rejected at this point? 2023. (The journal I submitted to allows it to be reprinted by Complete Peer Review After your paper is submitted, it will enter the multi-step peer review process: 1. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? It is quite normal for a revised paper to be reviewed once again. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took twos months), the status was Awaiting Refee Scores. Try to address the comments, and try again. Apr 21, 2020 · I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. Mar 13, 2022 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. " The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where Mar 13, 2022 · If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. Is this not backwards? Thank you, Sara Peer Review Milestones. But now, three weeks have passed and Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Revisions of papers with a "Major revision" decision should be resubmitted within at most three months. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. So, please give me advice. The status of the paper changed several times. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" Major Revision - Major revision means that the submission has a clear contribution and there is enough evidence in the current submission to demonstrate that contribution. Mar 28, 2015 · AE stands for "Associate Editor. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural form) recommendations. Mar 16, 2022 · I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. Jun 16, 2020 · Coming to your query, what ‘Editorial assignment pending’ at this stage means is that your revised manuscript is awaiting a review by an associate editor (AE). This change has occurred Feb 18, 2022 · Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? Oct 1, 2012 · In my field (chemistry), the practice is: for those journals that make a clear distinction between minor and major revision requests, “major revision” means that the paper will have to undergo further review after revision, usually by the same referees, while “minor revision” means that while changes should be made, no further reviewing is needed. 30 submit 5. This change has occurred Nov 13, 2017 · In general, reject with resubmission is equivalent to a major revision in other journals; i. “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. Awaiting Editor Decision May 1, 2021 · I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. As a peer reviewer, it is useful to learn about common reasons for a 'major revision' verdict. 26 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 10. 6 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 6. makalah pada sistem, ditandai dengan Awaiting Assignment pada Status. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. During reject and resubmit, I got comments from 2 reviewers, and Aug 25, 2020 · Hi. It was perhaps a minor revision or not a very extensive major revision. In this case 15 days is plenty of time to ask for a status update. 20 awaiting AE There are several decisions that authors may receive after submitting their paper to one of the Society’s journals: Reject without review: The Action Editor has rejected the paper without sending it for peer review. Nov 19, 2020 · I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor has to look for other reviewers. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. After 2 months of peer review process, the response was “moderate revision has been requested” and they told me that the new version is Jan 19, 2021 · After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. This change has occurred Jun 26, 2020 · I downvoted this answer because by far the most time consuming step is the peer review itself, and "awaiting AE assignment" is a sign that review has not started yet. After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 28 days to complete the assignment. Sep 12, 2022 · Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". Note that pdf files often have tags that identify who/what created them that can be uncovered by mischievous authors. June 2, 2023, major revision. Okay, it has been sent for review again. 04 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 12. 12. 2. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". procession一般3-4天后就会安排主编。 2、awaiting reviewer assignment 等待指定审稿人。 主编在选择审稿人，等待审稿人回复是否同意审稿。一般在一周以内。看审稿人回复速度。 3、awaiting reviewer scores 等待审稿人审稿意见。美陶要求审稿人三周内给审稿 Jul 19, 2019 · I have submitted my paper to an IET journal. So, why has it returned to the referee(s) after last week's status? I have revised the manuscript two times: the first major revision and the second minor revision. 29 submitted after major revision 22. It is almost 5 months since resubmission. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. Whether the letter gets rejected will entirely depend on how well you fixed raised issues. A serious review should be at least 1-2 pages of single spaced text. The SE is the final decision maker in reviewing submissions for MISQ. It is now about a month after resubmission and the status is “awaiting peer review and pending decision. I was asked to resubmit the paper with modifications within a month. [email protected] Submitted my paper. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: At least 4 reviewers have been invited, but less than 4 have agreed to review. 19 Awaiting AEIC recommendation 01. A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). Aug 9, 2022 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. For example, if two reviewers have engaged with your manuscript but a third reviewer has not been secured, or if a reviewer was secured but had to withdraw and hasn’t yet been replaced Aug 31, 2017 · After 12 weeks, I received the first communication from the journal telling me that the double blind review process is finished; the final decision is that my paper needs a major revision and the deadline for submitting my comments/ revised manuscript is after two months. Furthermore, you can get inspired by sample peer Mar 15, 2016 · A rejected paper is sometimes resubmitted to the same journal, after some revisions. Editor in Chief assesses whether your manuscript is within the journal’s scope and, if so, assigns it to a relevant editor, who decides whether it should be sent for review. This change has occurred If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. After After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. example of cover page for assignment; how to write a cover letter for delivery driver; to do or make a speech; what does assignment mean in education; explaining 20220810 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment - Waiting for reviewer assignment on August 10, 2022. ” Should I inquire about the review status? Awaiting reviewer assignment Reviewers decide if they accept or decline the invitation (in the second case AE invites another reviewer). 2022/10/13 submit, Awaiting AE Assignment 2022/10/17 Status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/2/12 Status: Major Revision 2023/3/27 Major revision submission, Status: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2023/3/19 Status: Under review 2023/5/26 Status: Accept The review process took a long time, a total of 225 days, but Aug 5, 2014 · UgkR4R‡ ÀÕ=$¢²×ÃN °9iõ¨Z$d^°úãן þûO Á¸û ´lÇåöx}~_¾ÍúïäçËÑ« {ñ…¹ Œg^BÈÍ È1¤R²Ý6 Yr$ ›0üo~³ÿ “ÑŽéÆU »J’ý I have submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. – At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". It sounded like their "under review" meant basically "Under Editor's Review". Jul 12, 2023 · 三三三三三三 2023-07-12 March 10, 2023, submission. Jun 9, 2023 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. ” Why has nothing been done with it? In some cases, ScholarOne will show that status even if a manuscript is under review. If you are the original reviewer invited by the journal, you must: Contact the Associate Editor who invited you, to ask them to approve the co-review Jul 12, 2023 · 2023-7-8 major revision, 4 reviewers, one of whom raised a lot of questions and even corrected grammar errors. Awaiting reviewer scores Reviewers are working on their reviews. To be honest, I don't even want to make any more changes, submitting is too frustrating. So we sent query to the editor. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. 14 Awaiting AE recommendation 01. 15 Awaiting Reviewer scores 01. 05. ""Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. May I know is there any chances for at least to get a major revision. Dec 10, 2020 · You haven’t mentioned how many reviewers accepted the peer review the first time. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. 6. Nov 13, 2016 · One of my manuscript was submitted to a journal in one year and four months ago, and after two rounds of reviews, its status was changed to "Awaiting EIC Decision" two weeks ago. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: At least 4 reviewers have been selected, but less than 4 have been invited. However, for Scientific Reports, it’s typically two or three. Common Reasons for Getting A “Major Revision” Decision. Terdapat empat keputusan yang akan diperoleh setelah proses review terjadi: 1. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. Feb 14, 2023 · After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. The file of the manuscript with an overdue revision Dec 14, 2014 · I submitted my revision and 5 days after the resubmission the dashboard was converted into "awaiting EIC decision". Examples of reviewer comments can help!Here you can find an overview of sample comments and examples for the most common review decisions: ‘minor revisions’, ‘major revisions’, ‘revise and resubmit’ and ‘reject’ decisions. Status akan berubah menjadi In Review dalam beberapa waktu ketika proses review mulai dilakukan. Should I Feb 28, 2021 · My paper underwent a revision. , reviewers think your letter has merit but needs major changes. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. After submitting the minor revision, the status changed to under review and pending approval. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. In the case of major revisions, the manuscript does go back to the same reviewer who reviewed your manuscript the first time. 06. 6. What do reviewers look for? This will vary from title to title, for example a journal with a strong research focus will put more emphasis on research methodology, while journals publishing case studies will focus on the quality of the case and accompanying teaching note. 28 submitted after minor revision 22. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which is the equivalent of "Under review. Jul 18, 2019 · I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. " Oct 24, 2018 · You mention that the status is “Awaiting reviewer selection” under “Minor revision” and you also mention that you re-submitted your manuscript after major revisions. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon Aug 4, 2021 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Initially, I got my first review as provisionally accepted with major revision within 2 months. Jan 21, 2021 · 1、awaiting admin. When a manuscript is listed as "In reviewer agreement" in a journal's status, it means that the reviewer or reviewers who have been assigned to the manuscript are EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. Awaiting AE recommendation The paper received the sufficient number of reviews (usually 2) and, on their basis, AE I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Jul 4, 2020 · I submitted my manuscript five weeks ago, and in a week, the status appeared as 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection. So, perhaps the AE believes they can check the manuscript on their own. Now what? Feb 18, 2022 | Scholarly publishing. Latest Articles. He did not tell me that it would be sent out for a third review. So how am I getting "rejected" because of one bad review out of 10? Even if it is a major revision, the due date is 24 November, which is 13 days ahead, quite bizarre for a "major revision". However, it was under review for 5 months. Diterima dengan Jan 31, 2024 · Answer: Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. During this time, the editor looks for suitable reviewers for your paper and sends out review invitations. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. Especially if you are unsure about how to formulate your feedback. " Does this The EiC usually reaches a decision within 3 days after receiving the AEs recommendation. I submitted the revised manuscript after one-and-a-half months. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo Aug 3, 2021 · Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. 5. Based on the information you have provided though, it was probably a major revision. As far as I know, Feb 27, 2022 · 2021-12-20 Awaiting EIC Decision 2021-12-20 Major Revision (Reviewer assigned for 18 days, review took 22 days, totaling 40 days) 2022-01-27 Inviting reviewers 2022-01-29 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2022-02-06 Awaiting Co-EIC Decision 2022-02-07 Accept (Reviewer assigned for 2 days, review took 8 days, totaling 10 days) Incredibly lucky, accepted 22. Nov 12, 2020 · Because "reviewer10" is written, I would assume that the paper was reviewed by at least 6 reviewers. This change has occurred Major revision in June 2023 (accepted by reviewers 3-4, reviewer 5 is nowhere to be found, a new reviewer 6 rejects the submission) Reviewer 6 said that this whole category of methods is not valid. What is the decision process for a typical paper? Nearly all papers fall into one of three categories: i) Rejected without review (as described above), ii) Rejected after review, and iii) a Major Revision followed by a Minor Revision followed by Accept. Opposed reviewers by authors authors may see the status “Awaiting EIC Assignment”. If the previous editorial decision was C (revise & re-review) or D (major revisions & re-review), the paper will be sent for re-review to the original reviewers, together with your responses. 03. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. The more comments you make the more helpful it is to the editor and authors. The most common reason for a manuscript to receive a major revision decision is that, while the topic is of interest and relevant to readers of the journal, the editors are unable to determine, from the existing version of the paper, whether the quality is sufficient for dissemination. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. 26 Awaiting Editorial Official Checklist 9. You haven’t also mentioned whether it was a major revision or a minor revision. This journal allows co-reviewing, meaning an invited reviewer can work with a more junior colleague to review a manuscript for the purpose of reviewer training. 17 major revision 22. ASE AU — ASE sends a revision decision to AU (if a revision is required) within one week, normally a couple of workdays. The review process is fast, hoping for a good result. Reviewer List After you have selected Reviewers from the Search Results and/or Added a Reviewer, all those selected will show up on the Reviewer List tab. Peer-reviewing an academic manuscript is not an easy task. Three weeks ago, the status was changed to "review completed". Peer Review in Progress. I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. This change has occurred May 6, 2021 · The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). 04. Or (in one system I know of), that the editor has not assigned the necessary number of reviewers. It means that the peer reviewer considers a manuscript suitable for publication if the authors rectify some major shortcomings. Reject: The paper has been through the peer review process and the Mar 10, 2020 · I submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses the ScholarOne system. Pay particular attention to your Associate Editor Tasks: - Accept/Decline Associate Editor Assignment - Awaiting Referee Assignment - Contact Potential Referee - Under Review - Awaiting Associate Editor Recommendation - All Pending Manuscripts - Waiting for Revision Apr 27, 2017 · I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. After Sep 11, 2017 · In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. Nov 30, 2020 · The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. Jan 31, 2024 · "Awaiting recommendation" means the manuscript's peer review process has been completed, and the handling editor has sent such manuscript to the chief editor to decide whether After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Feb 17, 2021 · Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the status changes to "Under review. 3. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again 제가 궁금한 것은 이 Awaiting AE recommendation이 'revision된 논문을 다시 재심사를 위해 이전의 review에게 보낼지의 여부', 즉 재심사냐 바로 rejection이냐를 AE가 recommendation을 한다는 말인지 아니면 AE가 그냥 'revised manuscript와 responses to reviewer를 보고 accept이나 monor revision . 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: Less than 4 reviewers have been selected for a manuscript. 28 Awaiting EA Decision 6. July 5, 2023, minor revision. This change has occurred Nov 5, 2019 · The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" means that your paper has cleared teh initial editorial screening and will be sent for peer review. 26, awaiting reviewer scores. Major Revision: The manuscript may be accepted with major revisions. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". 审稿人可能暂时不可用：原审稿人有 With a typical ScholarOne configuration, "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that it is actually out with (at least some) reviewers, while "Under Review" would instead mean the previous stage, where it is being considered by the handling editor(s) and might still be rejected without review. Do I just keep waiting, send another email? What should I do with this frustrating I have revised the manuscript two times: the first major revision and the second minor revision. This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). As a result of this, you may receive a further round of comments from the same reviewers. This change has occurred Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. " Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. The manuscript is likely to be accepted after authors address requests for revision that do not involve major re-working of the data analysis and presentation or of the organization and text of the manuscript. I for example look at my assignments once a week. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. Possible decisions are Accept, Minor revision, Major revision, and Reject. But my question is as below. Once enough reviewers have been selected, the manuscript will move on to the next stage. Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised Aug 31, 2019 · After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. – add, click Add Reviewer, and this will add the Reviewer to your list of Reviewers and add a new person record to the system. This change has occurred Aug 21, 2023 · 论文小修后await. . SE Role . Is it a bad sign? Is it ok if I send them an email? Aug 12, 2019 · I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. Now for the last 2 weeks, it's showing awaiting EIC. As per mystery understanding, the status require be Awaiting EIC Decision. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! Feb 26, 2021 · I have submitted a manuscript to a ScholarOne journal. 30 TE verifies reviewer comments under several headings: Author, Associate Editor, Reviewer, and General. 25 Rejected First review: 4 reviewers, minor revision, two major revisions, one rejection, editor gave rejection. Editorial decisions The decision on a manuscript is made by Feb 24, 2023 · 12. After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". 15-6. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. If a manuscript is awaiting revision, you will be able to extend the due date using the “Due on:” box and clicking “Save. The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. 对于论文小修后出现"awaiting reviewer assignment"的情况，通常并不会直接返回给原来的审稿人来审稿。 原因有以下几点：1. After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. ' It has been a month now, but the status has not changed. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. AU AE — AU submits a revision to AE, within five weeks for a minor/moderate revision, eight weeks for a moderate revision, and 10 weeks for a moderate/major revision. procession一般3-4天后就会安排主编。 2、awaiting reviewer assignment 等待指定审稿人。 主编在选择审稿人，等待审稿人回复是否同意审稿。一般在一周以内。看审稿人回复速度。 3、awaiting reviewer scores 等待审稿人审稿意见。美陶要求审稿人三周内给审稿 Sep 29, 2022 · Smile执着 2022-08-07 Dear experts, may I ask if a new reviewer has been assigned in this situation? The article's status is currently R0: Revise and Resubmit; R1: Accept As Regular Paper After Minor Revision; R2: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. 15 Awaiting AE 2023. Peer Review Milestones provides a timeline detailing when each user was assigned in a certain administrative or editorial role. 12, awaiting reviewer selection. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. I did expect that. I am not Jun 24, 2023 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 08. Revisions of papers with a "Minor revision" should be resubmitted with a month. None of them made a negative comment. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? Jul 9, 2019 · In the first notification, I got a major revision. 9, awaiting reviewer assignment. 05 awaiting reviewer assignment 22. 'Major revisions' is one of the most common peer review decisions. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. So, why has it returned to the referee(s) after last week's status? Nov 19, 2020 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo Aug 24, 2021 · Hi. 01 awaiting reviewer invitation 22. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. Should I be worried? Is there anything I can do to accelerate this process? The problem is, I am planning to submit an adapted version of the manuscript as a book chapter. Translation: 21. Ditolak 2. After another month, I got back the review, asking to work on minor revisions. " This status has not been changed for a month. View shows some examples of your file has not mean that you do reviewers task you must be? Once the final review comes in, the authors should upload the files that still necessary reduce the evaluation of big work. 20 Major Revision 12. minlimin 2023-07-09 Jan 21, 2021 · 1、awaiting admin. If the paper is not rejected, there are three possible recommendations: “accept (as is)”, “minor revision”, and “major revision”. Major revision should only be used if the paper excels in (1) relevance and interest to TACO's audience, and (2) the submission has significant contributions and/or is novel Jul 8, 2015 · I submitted journal in the field of psychometrics about one year ago. Peer review The Editor decides whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. After the review scores come back, a manuscript then Dec 12, 2019 · I submitted my manuscript to a journal. Has anyone had this experience [email protected] Submitted my paper. Nov 16, 2015 · A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. I have submitted an article to a JCR-indexed journal in November and in March, following the request of the journal, I submitted a revised version that contained changes to the introduction and literature review. SEs, after considering the recommendation of the AE and the input from reviewers, make the sole determination about which papers are published, which papers will be returned for revision, and which papers will not move forward in the review cycle. After six months, I received the reviews and was asked to do major revisions. It is just guessing. 3. 28 Major Revision 8. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. 26 awaiting AE recommendation 22. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. Then I revised and resubmitted. It mean that ae assignment after a reference citations in awaiting final decision at major Jul 1, 2017 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. « I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Admin Dashboard （管理者ダッシュボード）に表示される査読プロセス中の論文ステータスは以下の通りです。 Jun 9, 2021 · The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). 25 Awaiting EIC decision 01. The editor discussed the decision with one of his associates and then asked me to wait for a couple of days to render a final decision. t backed up) waiting to be sent to some reviews. These revisions were trivial, and so I resubmitted after one week. from you can mean that each author. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. 02 awaiting reviewer scores 22. Your article has secured the minimum number of required reviewers. 12. The major revision was given a 6-week time frame and required to be within 12 pages. Nov 12, 2018 · The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. 06 awaiting reviewer scores. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The Nov 21, 2022 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Oct 24, 2018 · I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). However, today it is changed into "editor assignment pending". 20, awaiting reviewer scores, should be under review. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. 18 Awaiting AE Recommendation 6. 14, awaiting reviewer selection. 8 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 11. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. This change has occurred Feb 15, 2023 · As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. 5. Editor/Associate Editor assigns/invites reviewers. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. tuwumbtf lpxoc mopr tlcssi lncpva htwu olxp emmn msbyh xyv