Major revision review time. However, I am not in a position to submit yet.

Major revision review time As time is running out, can I have a sample mail for requesting more time for the revised submission? Sep 18, 2024 · The average number of external revision rounds during the entire peer-reviewed process (include both accepted and rejected manuscript). 2. ) 이 논문의 경우 minor revision이기 때문에 대체로 까다롭지 않은 간단한 수정만해서 보내면 게재될 수 있을 것으로 생각된다. As a peer reviewer, it is useful to learn about common reasons for a 'major revision' verdict. The revised manuscript will require further review and may require additional revision. Major Revision = Manuscript has significant scientific merits but requires some major changes or revisions by the author, and should be returned to the reviewers for a second review round. One of my co-authors stated that this might be mainly due to the journals aiming to improve their metrics, e. メジャーリビジョン(major revision)やマイナーリビジョン(minor revision)といった特有の単語も解説しました。 学術論文が採択されるまで何をしなければいけないか知りたいですか？投稿から採択までの全ての手順を説明しました。Nature, Scienceなどに投稿するなら (We had four reviewers. , the time taken by authors to revise and resubmit the manuscript. Three weeks from submit to accept! On the other hand my papers in lower journals were subject to lazy editors being slow to send out for review, slow process of getting reviewers, and waiting for all reviewers to review even minor grammatical errors and such. If they can be corrected in time, the authors are given the chance to revise and resubmit (major revision). I have submitted journals in top journals where one review round was between 9 months to a year. Jun 4, 2020 · I have revised my initial manuscript with a major revision after the first decision. It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). Especially if you are unsure about how to formulate your feedback. Complete the required forms, including a new Statement of Financial Responsibility if the property owner or financially responsible party has changed since the permit was issued Deadlines for Regular Review ♦ Reviewers are given 6 weeks to review the submission. The EiC checks that the review process is solid. Most likely this will involve conducting substantial Aug 23, 2018 · Peer review is about more than just rubber stamping, let’s not forget. It all depends on the discipline and journal process: though there are other factors. The average number of external revision rounds during the entire peer-reviewed process (include both accepted and rejected manuscript). Now, again it The first review was a major revision, then after submission of revision, within two months, I have received a minor revision. Feb 28, 2022 · Under review: When at least one reviewer agrees to review (status change from reviewer assigned to Under review). A major revision often requires more substantive changes prior to being appropriate for publication. If it is an actual reject, the corresponding Decision email will state that no resubmission is allowed. We usually allow between two and four weeks for you to send your revised article back to us, but this may vary by journal. Take the list of comments and suggestions and group them into categories, and then identify which require a minor revision and which require a major revision. The status in the last 15 days was "Awaiting Editors Decision". But, if the mistakes can't be corrected in time. At least two review reports are collected for each submitted article. We addressed all the reviewers' comments either by following their suggestion or letting them know about the obstacle if the comments could not be incorporated. I have to leave the institute within 2 months. Review guidelines. Response: A minor revision often implies that there are a limited number of changes that are needed to improve the manuscript for publication. e. The immediate rejection time is thus a major indicator of a journal’s performance. ♦ Reviewers are given 3 weeks to review the major revision. Now, again it And how much time is usually is given to the reviewers to review a revised manuscript? This is highly journal dependent, that is, weeks to months. ” I had this with one paper (Medical Care) and I think I had two of these rejections before the minor formatting revision pre-acceptance (longest submission process in my career; one year from first submission to acceptance). Perhaps the initial reviewers were unavailable, so the manuscript was sent to new reviewers, and the new reviewers (understandably) have a different opinion. Would you submit to a journal with a median of 30 days for a decision, or a journal with a 120 days for a decision? Aug 5, 2019 · Major revision. When editors, reviewers, and authors have put time into critiquing and improving a paper, it just seems downright unfair to reject the paper. After 80 days, I got the first decision (major revision) with very simple comments from 3 reviewers. This can include conducting new data analysis or experiments, overhauling or substantially reframing the literature review or discussion section, or integrating a substantial amount of new background research. When I called my parents they thought I had failed from how I sounded. 首先扼要而言，major revision，相比较minor revision，主要区别在修改的幅度和修改后的处理流程。Minor revision一般小修改后直接由editor审核即可。而major revision意味着，文章主体内容的改动，修补以及完成后的再送审（相同的reviewers）。当然，并不是所有 Recently, our manuscript got major revision from three reviewers. First of all, do the review ahead of schedule, as soon as you can, and before the arbitrary 6 week deadline. The normal trend of the journal shows acceptance of the majority of articles in fewer than 30 days after submission of the revised version. Mine also last about 5 hours and I got major corrections. I remember the first time I got a major revision I sort of panicked too, but from my experience this is totally unnecessary! So congratulations, enjoy the moment and, go make that rebuttal! 2 days ago · Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. Aug 28, 2022 · Papers that include potentially publishable material but require major changes (e. Depending on the extent of the minor revision, the editor may decide not to send it out for re-review. Reconsider after major revision, appropriate to select if you Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. , additional experiments or new analyses of existing results; major rewriting of algorithms and explanations; clarifications, better scoping and improved motivations) are eligible for the major revision outcome. But that gets extended because they sometimes wait to accept the invitation to review, which starts the clock. Once revisions are made, there will be a second review and comment period, as promised, to allow time for the community to provide feedback. There's nothing you can do about this however except for withdraw your paper to submit elsewhere (in which case you'll have to put up with another 1+ month of review time anyway). Now, the manuscript is 'Under Review'. My last paper had a single major revision and the revision was not even sent to reviewers. Obviously, as it was Christmas, I have received hardly any answers from my co-authors, including from my supervisor who has the data that needs to be revised. The paper is relatively long (40 pages) so I am trying to avoid unnecessary work. and ask to submit revised version in about 14 days. Manuscripts with a Minor Revision decision will be allowed 15 days to resubmit their revised manuscript. One of the editor's responsibilities is precisely taking a decision in the case the reviews are mixed. I fulfilled the revisions and sent the manuscript on 10. Our editorial process The planned revision process builds on the work done by the review committees through the Shaping GME process and the major revision of the Institutional Requirements. Now, again it During peer review, reviewers will be able to access your manuscript securely using our online system, whilst maintaining referee anonymity. After long months of waiting, I received reviewing results with another major revision. Aug 22, 2022 · First, papers going through review are a lot more likely to be accepted. I agree, minor revisions are entirely writing errors, while major revisions requires data reinterpretation. There is no guarantee of acceptance after major revision. Then, we submitted our manuscript and now it has been being under review. The process also intentionally seeks broad input from the medical education community and the public, ensuring that the revision of the Common Program Requirements will be a Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. I submitted the revised manuscript along with my responses to the reviewer comments, but about 45 days have already passed since the status was changed to Under Review. We tried to return rejections after one review if the concerns were conceptual (like limited novelty or lack of mechanistic insight for a new drug or targeted pathway), which would be hard to address sufficiently in a revision. You can access answers to a variety of frequently asked questions (FAQs) on this page. The revise and resubmit nowadays is the equivalent to "major revision" from before: journals do this to report that the time from submission to publication is short, which helps their metrics and make them more attractive. However, I am not in a position to submit yet. Apr 14, 2023 · 3. Sep 10, 2016 · The current status is "under review" since July 23. Nov 8, 2015 · I have found from reading other reviewers' reviews (on the same paper that I am reviewing) that reviewers who clicked "reject" the first time often ask for major revisions the second time, possibly because the initial review was pointing out more "big picture issues" rather than smaller innacuracies. Minor revisions will include formatting or writing suggestions and are typically issues you can easily address. Most quality journals take time to complete the peer Sounds like my viva. Revise and resubmit, however, is likely followed by a rejection. My journal asks reviewers to return their work within 3 weeks. Please share your experiences with the community. Nov 8, 2018 · This is the nightmare scenario for you, since it'll easily add another 1+ month to the review time. The median time to review a revised version of a paper is a little over 2 months. 5 revision rounds during the entire peer-review process. We have revised the manuscript again responding to all the third reviewer highlighted points (some points are not responsible for that reason we submitted a rebuttal letter to the editor before sending the revision). After submitting the revised version, I am still waiting for almost 3 months with one status "In peer review". ♦ Editors are given 2 weeks to review a minor revision. Peer Review The primary criteria for judging the acceptability of a manuscript are its quality, novelty, and scientific importance. Should I proceed to address all the questions posed by reviewers or should I just withdraw the paper and submit it elsewhere to save time? It is very uncommon for manuscripts submitted to peer-reviewed journals to be accepted directly, without a request for revision. I understand that the consensus in the community in the case of revisions is that the AE sees value in the paper but that does seem to be the case here from my understanding. Jun 16, 2018 · In total it took 24 weeks from submission to a 'Major revision' decision - and resulted in a very unhappy author. Out of the four reviewers, the first suggested minor revision with no further re-review, the second reviewer wanted to see the manuscript in revised form, the third rejected it, and the fourth suggested publication (though he also suggested us to try for a higher impact journal). Feb 28, 2022 · Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Major Revision. For a minor revision the authors get a time of 1 month. Assessments of the major or minor revision can take 2-4 weeks, as they may depend upon the original reviewer’s availability to review the authors’ response and changes. May 31, 2015 · We have written a revised manuscript since the original version is received a decision of "major revision. is that minor or major revision Some journals have this weird category “reject with invitation to resubmit,” which functions as an alternative to “major revisions. Read more about revising your manuscripts I have submitted a paper to an Elsevier journal and have already gone through 4 rounds of peer review and the editors have suggested a major revision each time. ' Learn what these editorial decisions precisely mean, and how to react. Cite. Manuscripts with a Major Revision decision will be allowed 30 days to resubmit their revised manuscript. 3 revision rounds during the entire peer-review process. However, my supervisor told me several times when submitting papers that there's no such thing as minor revisions anymore and everyone seems to always say major just because they can. average time to process articles, e. Journal Paper Review (Computer Science) taking so long (after submitting revised manuscript)? How to proceed? It can take anywhere from a day to 3 months to get reviews back. Peer-reviewing an academic manuscript is not an easy task. ♦ Authors have a maximum of 3 months to submit their major revisions. In these cases we’d request that you accept the review, and be appropriately critical, per below. Based on the PLoS ONE Review Speed Feedback System, it takes 3. Now, again it Mar 9, 2017 · The immediate rejection time is thus a major indicator of a journal’s performance. What can I do now? How long does it take for major revision to be accepted after resubmission? It depends upon the revised manuscript subject matter and reviewers and editors evaluation speed. The pilot aims to help make the peer review process for articles and journals more transparent, and enable the community to better assess and compare peer review practices between different journals. Since major revisions papers get sent back to reviewers, it seems like a major drain of reviewer, author and editorial time if such a high % of these papers get rejected. The following summary describes the peer review process for IEEE Access: Identity transparency: Single anonymized. Jun 17, 2023 · However, 60 days isn't too long for a major revision. Key substantive components of the revision. Request a major revision, where authors revise Mar 22, 2020 · Hence, a major revision. So I ask how a paper takes long time like that for the review Major Revision: The editors believe that your article contains information of potential importance but major issues were identified. Revise your paper. If you come though the first round of review with minor revisions, pat yourself on the back, it's just a matter of time before your work gets published. The status changed to These changes usually require more time and it is likely we will need to send the revised article back to at least one of the reviewers. Note: Plans are submitted online. The following decision types are available: Reject; Major revision; Minor revision Feb 17, 2022 · We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. Jul 1, 2018 · Reviewers, in fact, can recommend one of five decisions: a) publish as is, b) minor revision and publish, c) minor revision and re-review, d) major revision and re-review, and e) reject. Furthermore, you can get inspired by sample peer When I review a paper, I suggest a major revision in two cases: like your response the first time around you might get stuck in a major revision hell for a long time. major revision이나, minor revision이면 리뷰어의 심사에 따라 논문을 수정해서 보내야 한다. Dec 30, 2019 · Thus, it is difficult to tell how much time the final decision will take after a major revision. . 今天我们来一起看看按外审意见改后要怎么回复。 当你收到'Major Revision'的修改意见时，这意味着编辑和审稿人认为你的论文有潜力，但需要进行一些重要的修改和改进才能符合期刊的要求和标准（ 如果希望不大的话，压根就不会给你修改的机会 ）。 There are many cases where the major revisions require a different review pool, where the reviewers specific that they wash their hands and wont re-review and or when the major revisions alter the interpretation and outcome in some way. That’s why you should never consider your work as “finished” – there’s always some way Jul 16, 2022 · Usually, the editor determines the gravity of the mistakes within the manuscript. If this were a major revision, then this story is a little strange, but understandable. The most common reason for a manuscript to receive a major revision decision is that, while the topic is of interest and relevant to readers of the journal, the editors are unable to determine, from the existing version of the paper, whether the quality is sufficient for dissemination. One key to a successful revision after an accept with major revision decision is careful execution of the specific revisions requested by the editors (which may include suggested revisions provided by the referee). Based on the Applied Soft Computing Journal Review Speed Feedback System, it takes 1. 0 on the Revision Smart Form asks teams whether the revision they are submitting is a minor revision or a major revision. Nov 12, 2020 · You are being rejected because of one bad review and the editor's judgment based on their own reading. It took me a long time to realise I hadn't failed. Am I completely off? Major Revisions (aka Revise and Resubmit) indicates a manuscript that requires significant revision to organization, clarity, argument, and/or other components; this recommendation automatically triggers re-review. Two reviewers were completely satisfied with my revision and recommended acceptance. Publishing your article marks the start of its dissemination journey. Understand and accept the decision : An editor typically chooses one among the four types of decisions listed below with the help of comments provided by the reviewers and his May 9, 2017 · In fact, papers that receive a major revision request are almost always sent for a second round of review. Aug 8, 2020 · Round 1 revision or first review of a paper; Major Revision; Minor Revision; I find that if a major revision is required then the authors receive a time of 2 months for fixing it. PLOS Computational Biology uses single-anonymized peer review. And if you make a hard rule you’re chambering a torpedo for the unscrupulous/biased reviewer. He/She wanted to provide more details in some parts of my manuscript. Jan 25, 2020 · I submitted a manuscript to Elsevier. May 20, 2017 · Few months ago, I have submitted my manuscript to a very reputed journal. Most submitted manuscripts go through a meticulous review process by several reviewers who are experts in the given subject; these reviewers may request major or minor revisions or even reject the manuscript. Address all points raised by the editor and reviewers. Reviewers remain anonymous unless they choose to identify themselves by signing Jun 6, 2021 · Why is it important to distinguish between minor and major revisions? Question 3. Major revision Mar 12, 2014 · It is therefore tempting as an Editor to go for the Major Revision and/or the Reject with option to resubmit option. Giving the best answer to this question is important because major revisions to studies that have been heard by the Full […] Minor revision: The manuscript is likely to be acceptable for publication after revision, commonly without further review. 2 of my papers came back as major revisions but it took maybe 2 hours of editing grammer and spelling to In my experience these will always be accepted once the changes have been made. Oct 12, 2021 · Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Dec 29, 2017 · Today, I received comments from reviewers stating that my paper is not worth publishing in the journal. – Jan 1, 2023 · For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. 16th Oct, 2022. The time to render a first decision averages about 43 days, but times vary depending on how long it takes for the editor to receive and assess reviews. In this article, we have grouped b, c, and d together under the heading ‘reviewers’ manuscript (major) revision’. ) I know that revisions, both major and minor, hint at a higher chance of acceptance. Thanks! Here’s a process and then a format that I recommend in this case. Minor Revisions. Common Reasons for Getting A “Major Revision” Decision. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. Information about revision to acceptance time should be reported on the journal page. The editor stated that the reviewers find the 3択 です。 (1)リジェクトされる。(2)もう一度メジャーリビジョン、(3)マイナーリビジョンです。 (1) リジェクトされる: リブッタルレターで質問に回答できておらず、今後やりとりしても改善されることはないなと判断されたということです。 The peer review process is handled by the conference committee, and the review method as well as the number of reports is decided by the conference organizers' requirements. The editor considers reviewer feedback and their own evaluation of the manuscript in order to reach a decision. A second major revision was decided. from "first" (in this case second) submission to publication. I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. I have already addressed 4 peer-reviewers, and in my last submission I addressed the comments of the 4th reviewer. So I'm wondering which one this response is. Now, from my earlier experience, I am worried uf they again take 5 months to review a minor revision, or suggest something else (like a major revision after a long time). Jan 21, 2015 · But yeah, their “major revisions” were a couple weeks of experiments and some bioinformatics. Contents The meaning of a 'desk-rejected' paperWhat to do if your paper is desk-rejectedThe meaning of 'revise and Aug 20, 2023 · There is no deadline nor any notion of 'major revision' as per other journals. The more you share it within the first 6-12 months, the more views and citations it will receive. It means that the peer reviewer considers a manuscript suitable for publication if the authors rectify some major shortcomings. The appro ach is Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Ok, so you’ve agreed to review the paper. 7投稿 4. Reject and Resubmit = Manuscript has some scientific merits but some critical issues to be addressed. One recommended major revision, two recommended minor revision, and one recommended acceptance. Sep 19, 2019 · Peer Review Process; Navigating peer review: How to respond to peer reviewer comments – Major revisions. Manuscripts that undergo major revision may require re-review or additional statistical review. Generally how many days does it take for a 2nd round of review? And how long should I wait to make an inquiry? Aug 28, 2014 · The authors submitted a major revision and I am asked to review the paper again. Minor revision might also include providing more accurate explanations for some of the results or adding more results of control experiments that can be easily performed, that are not critical to supporting conclusions and that might not need further peer review for validation. Lacking detail at first review stage – even if the recommendation is for Minor Revisions, the reviewer should be able to justify why the paper is already suitable. Please view these current metrics for additional information. This factor is therefore also included in our analysis. In this way, each group can inform the other as it undertakes its major revision effort. Examples of reviewer comments can help!Here you can find an overview of sample comments and examples for the most common review decisions: ‘minor revisions’, ‘major revisions’, ‘revise and resubmit’ and ‘reject’ decisions. There is an implicit contract with the authors that the paper will be accepted in the next round, provided the authors respond to the review team comments in good faith. Makes sense to me as it doesn't really seem to be a differene to major revisions imo (I got the same reviewers again). g. What is the decision process for a typical paper? Nearly all papers fall into one of three categories: i) Rejected without review (as described above), ii) Rejected after review, and iii) a Major Revision followed by a Minor Revision followed by Accept. Authors can then resubmit their article as 'new'. Revised manuscripts will be assessed by a professional editor and the same Academic Editor. Apr 13, 2017 · 2 weeks of review time is really not very long, even for a minor revision (which, strictly speaking, yours apparently isn't, at least not to the editor). Apr 15, 2021 · The editor gave us a major revision again. Describe the major revisions to your manuscript in your response letter followed by point-by-point responses to the comments raised. After a month in peer review, i received comments of FIVE reviewers with a message from the academic editor that it needed a Major revision as reviewers had serious issues with the manuscript. If an application is deemed complete, it moves to the next step of the workflow, typically the technical review. 6 revised version review，第一次是major revision，1、4号审稿人的意见很消极，第一个人直接说不能发表，第四个给了一堆意见，然后其中一些意见已经是没法改了（马上毕业），2、3号审稿人意见还行，2号3个yes3个can，3号2个yes4个can，全部改完之后提交了 Bad Review. Outright acceptance of a journal paper is rare. It’s just like in a hospital: if you get hit by a bus, you are taken to the Nov 21, 2022 · Status of paper changed from "Awaiting recommendation" to "Peer review in Process", after Major revision and minor revision completed. Now, again it Mar 12, 2021 · This list will guide your revision of the paper. there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated. Even if it is a major revision, the due date is 24 November, which is 13 days ahead, quite bizarre for a "major revision". Then, a rejection decision is made. But you should consider months between (re)submission and decision. If the author does not submit the revised version on time, the manuscript is withdrawn and rendered inactive (please see the Expired Revisions section below). It takes roughly Mar 30, 2022 · Hello everybody. Minor revision may undergo referee evaluation; however, in most cases, the editor accepts the paper without sending the revised manuscript to the reviewer. Follow the steps outlined for your permit type to reapply. Regarding your question about the deadline assigned to reviewers, this would vary across journals. After I sent the revised manuscript, the status was ‘’with editor’’ and did not change for two weeks. I think that there is also some pressure to use the to reduce time between receipt and acceptance by using the Reject & Resubmit option when in the old days you might have gone for Major Revision. The academic editor can suggest reviewers during pre-check. Should I: Re-review the entire paper as if I saw it the first time, At Scientific Reports, we focus on ensuring that all papers we publish are of high technical quality, and let the scientific community determine the impact of your work. 1 revision rounds during the entire peer-review process. Besides by the duration of the different steps of the peer review process, total publication time is also influenced by revision time, i. Major revision: It is not clear if the manuscript will become acceptable for publication, even after revision. Reconsider after major revision, appropriate to select if you Accept. Revised manuscripts that are received after these timeframes will need to be submitted as new manuscripts. Mar 4, 2016 · When I review a paper with a lot of problems, yet which I feel could probably be published with major changes, I try to include an explicit statement in my first review that looks something like this: "At a minimum, the authors need to make the changes that I have suggested in order for this paper to be publishable. Many manuscripts are potentially of interest but require substantial editorial and/or statistical revision prior to publication. Major revisions. After submitting their manuscripts to academic journals, authors receive one of several editorial decisions: 'desk reject', 'revise and resubmit', 'major revisions', 'minor revisions', or 'paper accepted. I done the revisions and i submitted last week. Aug 13, 2022 · Is it normal to have this short amount of time to accomplish major revisions? No. 아래와 같은 decision letter를 받았을 때, The possible result of this review is acceptance of the manuscript, and the AE communicates the decision to the EiC for action. Based on the Heliyon Review Speed Feedback System, it takes 2. Required reviews completed: Minimum number of reviews has been received. 何日かは 論文誌や論文によって違うので、正確な数字は言えません 。 ただここでは例として、私が典型的だと思っている私の2つの論文(Nature communicationsとSensir and actuator IFは3. If recommending rejection or major revision, state this clearly in your review (and see the next section, 'When recommending rejection'). 3 days ago · The average number of external revision rounds during the entire peer-reviewed process (include both accepted and rejected manuscript). Research articles submitted to journals are initially evaluated by an editor, or an editorial board member, in a process we call ‘editorial triage’. " Since the status remained "reviewer assigned," we sent a mail with requesting clarificati RQ - Major Revision: to request major, required revisions that will facilitate a second full review cycle by the original reviewers. The journal gave me two months for submitting the revised paper. Many journals hand out desk rejections without sending papers to reviewers but the practices vary and the decisions are not based on reviewer feedback so I rather consider desk rejection stage as an additional gate to After agreeing to review, external peer reviewers typically have 10 to 14 days to submit their review. Feb 27, 2024 · If I read a paper and think it only has a 50/50 chance of being publishable even after substantial revision, I would tend to recommend straight rejecting it. Mar 13, 2022 · Major Revision #1 Major Revision #2 “Coverage-Based Debloating for Java Bytecode” ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology Link: Major Revision #1 Minor Revision #2 “Automatic Specialization of Third-Party Java Dependencies” IEEE Transactions on Software Enginnering Link: Major Revision #1 Minor Revision #2 Jan 10, 2022 · The first round starts when the manuscript goes under review for the first time, since there is no preceding editorial decision. Before contacting the editor, you might want to consider the following. The papers co-chairs may offer a decision <Major Revision to CGF>, which is commonly referred to as “Fast Track”. 8. But "minor revision" means "if you do the listed revisions, and they don't meaningfully change the content of the paper, it'll be accepted". :) So, you could wait a week or so. Whenever possible, we invite earlier-round reviewers to re-review manuscripts following authors' revisions since they are best Disseminate your research. Step 10: Major Revision (MaR) of the Manuscript (45 days) Due to the more extensive nature of revisions required, we give 45 days for the author to complete a major revision. Now, again it It usually happened because a major shortcoming in supporting a big conclusion wasn't adequately met with sufficient data. As for major revisions, these are significant new experiments that could cause your premise to fall apart. 2021. THANKS!! Dec 27, 2022 · The time period for the revision is stated as being 7 days, starting with Dec 24. There're three reviewers, one decided recommend acceptation, other recommended a minor revision and the last one recommended a major revision. Some rapid publication journals might give 10-15 days for reviewers to get back with their reports; however, for most journals the review time is longer. Major Revision is great news! Pretty much everybody in the labs that I work in has major/minor revisions. I received a long cover letter where my comments and the comments of two other anonymous reviewers have been answered. Unfortunately there is no easy solution: it is difficult to find (good) reviewers, and they tend to be inundated with review requests as they are known to be reliable. I said I needed the bathroom at some point but literally just needed to cry and pull myself together. The journal office will follow up with late reviewers and keep you informed if there are any delays. As well as serving as a guarantor of final quality and acting as “gatekeeper” for journals, a major function of peer review is to improve the quality of what is published. Minor Revision. When Recommending Rejection Where manuscripts have serious flaws you should not spend any time polishing the review you've drafted or give detailed advice on presentation. Reviewer interacts with: Editor Aug 10, 2021 · I sent a manuscript to a high reputation Elsevier journal. Vast majority of the time – any review that recommends Acceptance at first round review. There is no way for us to know how long it will still take, but the unfortunate truth is that I see little reason to believe it's gonna be much faster than any previous (major) revision. All articles that require revision are 'rejected'. ♦ Authors have a maximum of 1 month to submit their minor revisions. My question is how long the revision will take? Because only one reviewer is I think of a major revision as one that involves substantial changes to the manuscript. As you can guess from the topic question, i had submitted my manuscript and i got major revisions from one reviewer (only one is assigned). Follow the steps below. Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Now, again it We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. The paper is then passed to the EiC. This manuscript, although meeting the criteria of novelty and appropriateness, is seriously flawed as to disclosure (either technical or literary or both), and requires a major rework by the author. If you can address the issues raised, the editors will reconsider your manuscript. The committee will also collaborate with the Common Program Requirements Task Force that will convene in January 2025. 5くらい)の日数をお見せします。 Aug 26, 2019 · My manuscript was given a Major Revision decision after peer review. For journals I have managed, the number of “major revision” papers that are eventually accepted stays solidly between 80-90%. A-accept (almost never after the first review round) B-minor revisions required (no further formal external peer review round required, editor makes decision) C-revise & re-review; D-major revisions & re-review; E-reject In my field, "major revision" means do the work and we'll decide if it's good enough, including possibly sending to new reviewers, and there's a very good chance it could still be rejected. They also sometimes just miss the deadline and ask for more time. Oct 1, 2012 · To my experience, major revision in general leads to the acceptance of a manuscript reviewed and re-reviewed for several rounds. My question: with the information above, would it be a good idea to skip the major revision and submit to another Journal? Review the following suggestions for how to deal with the revision process so that it is smooth for both both the author and the editor; this fosters a quick acceptance. Authors of manuscripts receiving a major revision are invited to revise their manuscript to address the reviewers’ and editors’ concerns. Jan 31, 2021 · Stack Exchange Network. Jan 8, 2021 · So, based on when all are back and available for the final check, the status will change and the manuscript move to the final review stage. Feb 22, 2021 · I got a review from a reputed Elsevier journal. If you need further assistance with your MDPI Books product or platform, please don't hesitate to contact the MDPI Books Support Team. Any major revisions without substantial detail and or/justification. Now, again it When revising your manuscript and responding to peer review comments you must: Thank the reviewers and editors for their time and comments. Anyway, as yours was a minor revision, you probably don’t have much need to worry, which actually may be just the reason you wish to hear the decision on your paper. Revision decisions do not guarantee acceptance even if all issues are addressed. Recommendation: Major revision and re-review required Reviewer Comments Required The authors propose and demonstrate an approach for generating triangular waveforms using a single drive MZM biased at the transmission null, proper polarization control of the input CW signal to the modulator, an optical filter, and a polarizer. True, the re-review usually does not take as long as the first review if the paper is sent to the same set of reviewers, but the editor can choose to send it to new reviewers, in which case, it can take longer. After two months, the status changed to Major Revision. I don’t think you can really apply the 1 major revision rule unless you can standardize what constitutes a major revision, which just seems impossible. Now, again it Reject/Resubmit (major revision and new external review required) – this applies to papers with good quality but require substantial changes to rectify technical problems, introduce additional results, and improve paper structure and presentations; the authors will be given up to 10 weeks (except for papers submitted to special issues Apr 8, 2016 · Recently, I have received a major revision decision for my paper. However, editorial decisions are based not just on the technical merits of the work, but also on factors such as priority for publication, presentation of the material, and relevance to the journal’s general readership. However, the editor decided to give it a major revision instead of outright rejection. 'Major revisions' is one of the most common peer review decisions. However, the editor has sent out another review invitation (#5 Reviewer). The first peer review process was completed after one month and a major revision was the decision. When the major revision of such a paper is submitted to CGF directly, CGF will treat it in the same way as a CGF submission that has already undergone the first review cycle and has received a major revision recommendation. In (pure) mathematics, my experience is that typically there is no set time limit on when to submit a minor or major revisions for a journal (exceptions are for special issues). The review process is subject to the completeness of an application, whether additional rounds of reviews are needed, and the applicant’s response to staff comments. bxgij zqzuliv fjoyho molvz byehnlq cyrs yrdq xawn hfrfxi bnz